Arduino Nano analog pins A6 A7 not mapped properly?

Analogue pins A0-A5 are ok, A6 does nothing, A7 is responding to input that A6 should be receiving? :confused:
(I’ve been using 8x “Value Display” widgets to read the 8x analogue channels, also 8x button widgets to switch on 8x LEDs! (I’m not very adventurous I know! :pensive: ))
(I set up 8x Pots in a row on a PCB for testing purposes, double checked and there all working fine! :relieved: So I’m guessing its in the Code (I’m using the ENC28J60 Example))
I had a look in the “Arduino-Nano.json” (Shown Below) Don’t know why I did that!? :confounded: but I noticed that A5 and A6 are mapped to the same number “19”. is that correct? :confused:
I’ve had no other problems with my setup, it all works fine :smile: .

============================================
==Arduino-Nano.json==

{
“name”: “Arduino Nano”,
“map”: {
“digital”: {
“pins”: {
“D0”: 0, “D1”: 1, “D2”: 2, “D3”: 3, “D4”: 4,
“D5”: 5, “D6”: 6, “D7”: 7, “D8”: 8, “D9”: 9,
“D10”: 10, “D11”: 11, “D12”: 12, “D13”: 13
},
“ops”: [ “dr”, “dw” ]
},
“analog”: {
“pins”: {
“A0”: 14, “A1”: 15, “A2”: 16, “A3”: 17,
“A4”: 18, “A5”: 19, “A6”: 19, “A7”: 20
},
“ops”: [ “dr”, “dw”, “ar” ],
“arRange”:[0, 1023]
},
“pwm”: {
“pins”: [
“D3”, “D5”, “D6”, “D9”, “D10”, “D11”
],
“ops”: [ “aw” ],
“awRange”:[0, 255]
},
“virtual”: {
“pinsRange”: [ 0, 31 ],
“ops”: [ “vr”, “vw” ]
}
}
}

============================================

Arduino Nano v3
ENC28J60 shield
arduino ide 1.6.5
Blynk 1.1
blynk-library-0.2.3
iPhone 5S - 8.1.2
Windows 7 64bit

Ps: I’m in no rush :sleeping: .

I think it’s a bug in JSON. Thanks for reporting. @vshymanskyy, please double check.

Thanks for pointing this out.
I fixed that, but it will take time to be updated in the Apps…

Also noticed that “Value Display” widgets (only A5 and A6) in the Blynk App seem to remap themselves from:
A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7
To
A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A5 A7
Or
A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A6 A6 A7
?! :confused:
This sometimes happens when I close and restart the app. Does the app get it’s pin mapping from the microcontroller? or is the problem with Arduino-Nano.json repeated in the app as well?

Exactly… so we fixed it in json.