Just pinging ny3.blynk.cloud returns the correct results…
C:\Users\Pete Knight>ping ny3.blynk.cloud
Pinging ny3.blynk.cloud [64.225.16.22] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 64.225.16.22: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=53
Reply from 64.225.16.22: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=53
Reply from 64.225.16.22: bytes=32 time=83ms TTL=53
Reply from 64.225.16.22: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=53
Ping statistics for 64.225.16.22:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 83ms, Maximum = 84ms, Average = 83ms
Pinging google.com [142.250.80.110] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 142.250.80.110: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=118
Reply from 142.250.80.110: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=118
Reply from 142.250.80.110: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=118
Reply from 142.250.80.110: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=118
Ping statistics for 142.250.80.110:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 27ms, Maximum = 29ms, Average = 28ms
Pinging lon1.blynk.cloud [159.65.55.83] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 159.65.55.83: bytes=32 time=104ms TTL=49
Reply from 159.65.55.83: bytes=32 time=105ms TTL=49
Reply from 159.65.55.83: bytes=32 time=105ms TTL=49
Reply from 159.65.55.83: bytes=32 time=104ms TTL=49
Ping statistics for 159.65.55.83:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 104ms, Maximum = 105ms, Average = 104ms
…and now ny3.blynk.cloud works!
C:\Users\bigmoose>ping ny3.blynk.cloud
Pinging ny3.blynk.cloud [64.225.16.22] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 64.225.16.22: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=53
Reply from 64.225.16.22: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=53
Reply from 64.225.16.22: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=53
Reply from 64.225.16.22: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=53
Ping statistics for 64.225.16.22:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 25ms, Maximum = 27ms, Average = 26ms
If one were starting from scratch for a Blynk2.0 application, should we use Edgent_ESP8266.ino as the baseline “wire skeleton” to build off of for a WiFi provisioning application?
Should we tag onto edgentTimer instead of creating another instance of BlynkTimer? … as in a statement like:
edgentTimer.setInterval(BLYNK_SEND_INTERVAL_MS, TimerEvent1); //sets up our timer event
where TimerEvent1 is a subroutine in my code, and
BLYNK_SEND_INTERVAL_MS is a const int of interval time in my code.
Okay, I’ve added all three items (template ID, device name, and token) to my legacy thermostat code, but the web dashboard still shows it offline, and there’s no communication with the new app. Watching the serial port output, it appears to be connecting to the wifi correctly. I get the "*WM: [3] unloading " indicating the WiFiManager has done it’s job. That’s usually the end of the serial output, but I did receive this after one bootup:
*WM: [3] unloading
jB⸮⸮⸮ the button to reset configuration…
[794] Hold the button to reset configuration…
[12351] Using Dynamic IP: 172.18.70.104
[12351] CONNECTING_NET => CONNECTING_CLOUD
[12463] Current time: Tue Jul 27 14:42:36 2021
[12463] Connecting to blynk.cloud:443
[13616] Ready (ping: 11ms).
[13713] CONNECTING_CLOUD => RUNNING
hello. I just found out that the old Blynk platform has stopped working. I have all my home automation made with the old platform, what happens with the energy that I have bought?